CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
What Causes the Discrepancy between Quantitative Computed Tomography and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry?
Hong Yoon, Jung-Ho Kim, Dal-Sung Ryu, Seung-Hwan Yoon
The Nerve. 2021;7(2):64-70.   Published online 2021 October 31    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2021.7.2.64

Excel Download

What Causes the Discrepancy between Quantitative Computed Tomography and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry?
The Nerve. 2021;7(2):64-70   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: Comparison with vertebral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography
Calcified Tissue International. 1995;56(1):14-18   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Ability Of Assessing Osteoporosis And Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture In The General Population When Using Thoracic Quantitative Computed Tomography: A Comparison Study Between Low-dose Thoracic Quantitative Computed Tomography And Lumbar Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2021;15(4):S41   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures
Osteoporosis International. 1996;6(5):407-415   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Technical Aspects of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Quantitative Computed Tomography for Assessment of Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition
Nuclear Medicine Textbook. 2019;1085-1098   Crossref logo
Link1

Bone measures in HIV-1 infected children and adolescents: disparity between quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements
Osteoporosis International. 2005;16(11):1393-1396   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Vertebral bone density evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in vitro
Bone. 1998;23(3):283-290   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Does Simultaneous Computed Tomography and Quantitative Computed Tomography Show Better Prescription Rate than Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Osteoporotic Hip Fracture?
Hip & Pelvis. 2018;30(4):233   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Lumbar vertebral body compressive strength evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and ashing
Bone. 1999;25(6):713-724   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Comparison of bone parameters by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in hutterite vs. non-hutterite women aged 35–60 years
Bone. 2001;29(2):192-197   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

This metadata service is kindly provided by CrossRef from May 29, 2014. Nerve has participated in CrossRef Text and Data Mining service since October 29, 2014.