INTRODUCTION
Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) are expandable non-neoplastic tumor-like lesions and possess a unique pathology reflecting the presence of blood filled cavities within the lesion4). Although most clinically diagnosed ABCs are observed in the metaphyseal region of long bones, approximately 10% to 30% of ABCs arise in the spine and contribute to approximately 15% of all primary spine bone tumors13). They usually affect young adolescents and can cause symptoms such as back pain, neurologic deficits, and pathologic fractures1). As ABCs were rare entity, no clear indication for any of the treatment modality has been described. We report a case of cervical spine ABC, treated with curettage through bone grafting.
CASE REPORT
A 16-year-old boy admitted to neurosurgery department with neck pain when turning his head to the right side. Except neck pain, he did not showed focal neurologic symptom and sign. Computed tomography (CT), vertebral arteriography showed multi-lobulated lytic lesion with multiple internal septations in C1 spine. Cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed well-defined lobulated osteolytic mass (2.0×1.5×1.8 cm), with rim enhancement in the right lateral mass of C1 spine (Fig. 1). The lesion showed internal septation with fluid-fluid level and encasing right vertebral artery (VA) (Fig. 2). Because the mass was encasing the VA, we planned lesion curettage rather than en-bloc resection. We performed right C1 lateral mass curettage, and filled with autologous posterior superior iliac bone graft. During the surgery, there was no injury to VA. He had no focal neurological deficit after the surgery. Three months after surgery, the patient’s neck pain was improved.
DISCUSSION
ABC was identified as a distinct clinicopathologic entity in 1942 by Jaffe and Lichtenstein4). ABC comprises about 1.4% of all bone tumors and 15% of all primary spine neoplasms6). And on the spine, lumbar involvement (34%) is followed by thoracic spine (32%) and uncommon in the cervical spine3). Cervical spine of ABCs are only 2% of all ABCs9). ABCs in the usually arises from posterior osseous elements and may spread to another vertebrae, adjacent rib, paraspinal soft tissues1). Therefore, our case is rare because ABC was located at middle column (lateral mass) of upper cervical spine with encasing VA.
Usually biopsy is used on ABC diagnosis, the combination of radiographs, CT scans, and MRI could be useful for diagnosis of ABC5). On CT, ABC appears as a multi-lobulated lytic lesion with multiple internal septations and fluid levels7). Liu et al.6) reported that the presence of multi-lobular cysts with fluid-fluid levels on T2 weighted MRI images is highly suggestive of ABC. At this case, we could assume that the tumor was cervical ABC because CT scan and MRI findings are consistent with the typical ABC, even if it does not consistent with the biopsy findings. In the paper of Wang et al.14), accuracy of biopsy was only 43%. Except en-bloc removal of the tumor, the biopsy should be taken for the cyst’s internal wall or from ant intralesional septum11). We took the intralesional septum for biopsy specimens, but the biopsy result was not consistent with the typical ABC. The reason we thought are as follows: insufficient specimens or inappropriate location for biopsy, where the tumor cell were scanty.
Treatment options for ABCs include intralesional curettage with or without bone grafting, complete excision, arterial embolization, intralesional drug injections (steroid and calcitonin) and radiation or a combination of these options1,2). Spontaneous regression of the tumor is uncommon10). The most important factors in preoperative planning are the location and the growing pattern of the ABC8). Besides, the VA that is generally encasing by the lesion is the most important anatomical structure that must be protected. Although surgical removal has the lowest rate of local recurrence, it may prove to be surgically challenging or even impossible, depending on the location and on the intraoperative blood loss. Because of a high index of VA rupture in en bloc spondylectomy, total excision by curettage with a high speed drill or piecemeal resection is a generally accepted surgical option12). In this case, curettage with bone grafting was chosen to protect VA because the tumor was located at right C1 lateral mass and VA was encased by the lesion. By this choice, we could save VA from damage and finish the surgery safely.