Multiple Spinal Metastases of Anaplastic Meningioma: A Case Report

Article information

Nerve. 2023;9(1):79-84
Publication date (electronic) : 2023 April 25
doi : https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2023.00269
1Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
2Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
3Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
4Department of Pathology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
Corresponding author: Soon Ki Sung Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, 20, Geumo-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-55-360-2126 Fax: +82-55-360-2156 E-mail: nscastle@naver.com
Received 2023 January 27; Revised 2023 April 7; Accepted 2023 April 20.

Abstract

Meningiomas are primary benign tumors that occur in intracranial and intraspinal regions. Rarely, atypical and anaplastic meningiomas exhibit malignant tendencies and can metastasize. A 56-year-old female patient visited the hospital complaining of a dull headache, mild dysarthria, sudden onset of blurred vision, and mild weakness in the left upper limbs. A homogeneously augmented mass was revealed in the right temporal lobe following magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and was determined to be an anaplastic meningioma after surgical resection. During follow-up, revision surgery was performed due to the recurrence of the primary tumor. After the revision surgery, the patient complained of new symptoms, which included paresthesia and muscle weakness in the right lower extremity. MRI revealed a mass in the cervical and lumbar vertebrae suspected to have been metastasized. Another revision surgery was conducted on the intracranial primary tumor. The tumor was resected from the cervical and lumbar vertebrae. Histopathology revealed that they were all anaplastic meningiomas. Although anaplastic meningioma is rare, it can cause extracranial metastases. This case shows that multiple spinal metastases of anaplastic meningioma require considerable attention in diagnosis and treatment.

INTRODUCTION

Meningiomas are primary benign tumors that occur in the intracranial and intraspinal regions. Although most meningiomas are benign, in rare cases, they could be malignant with aggressive metastases12). The types of meningiomas that can metastasize are the atypical (World Health Organization [WHO] grade II) and anaplastic (WHO grade III) types2), which account for less than 5% of all meningiomas9). In particular, extracranial metastasis is rarer, with an estimated incidence of 1 to 5 cases per 1000, and spinal metastasis has been reported only in a few studies1,3). We present a unique case of a patient diagnosed with anaplastic meningioma in 2011 with spinal metastasis, confirmed during examination for the second revision surgery due to the recurrence of the primary tumor.

CASE REPORT

A 56-year-old female patient at the time of diagnosis in January 2011 suffered from dull headaches, mild dysarthria, and sudden-onset blurred vision. On examination, she was lethargic with mild weakness (Medical Research Council [MRC] scale 4) in the left upper limbs. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a mass with peripheral vasogenic edema and a dense area in the right temporal lobe (Fig. 1A). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a homogeneously enhanced mass (approximately 5.5 × 2.8 × 3.6-cm in size) (Fig. 1B). In June 2011, the patient underwent right craniotomy and gross total resection. After the first surgery, there was no improvement in left motor weakness, but consciousness and speech were restored. Histological examination revealed anaplastic meningioma (WHO grade III). Gamma knife radiosurgery was performed 4 times at post-operative 2-, 4-, and 6-years to remove the remnant tumors after the initial surgery. Subsequently, an increase in the size of the remnant tumor in the primary site was confirmed in a follow-up MRI 7 years post-operatively (Fig. 2). A revision surgery was conducted, and the patient received radiotherapy of 60 Gy over 6 weeks.

Fig. 1.

Preoperative image. (A) Contrast-enhanced computed tomography shows a mass in the right temporal lobe with peripheral vasogenic edema. (B) Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance images show a strong, homogenous large mass in the right temporal lobe.

Fig. 2.

Eight years after the initial surgery, brain magnetic resonance images revealed an increase in the size of the remnant tumor in frontal lobe.

Spinal metastasis of the primary tumor was confirmed when the second revision surgery was to be performed. During the outpatient follow-up after the second revision surgery and radiotherapy, the patient complained of radiating back pain and weakness in the upper and lower extremities (MRC scale 3) which were absent before. A recurrence of the lesion was suspected, and MRI was performed. A mass, mimicking an en-plaque meningioma with an irregular margin (3.3 x 2.0 x 1.2-cm), and perilesional edema were confirmed (Fig. 3). The peculiarity here is that, unlike before, the patient rarely complained of headaches. There was back pain, and the weakness in the upper and lower extremities worsened and was accompanied by leg numbness, predominantly on the right. After a physical examination of the patient, a contrast-enhanced spinal MRI was utilized to evaluate the presence of metastasis to the spine. Although with some degree of expectation, an MRI of the spine revealed a lesion that appeared to be a contrast-enhancing metastatic tumor. Two contrast-enhancing lesions were identified, two intradural extramedullary tumors at the C2–3 level approximately 2.0 cm in size (Fig. 4A, B), and at the L4–5 level approximately 3.6 cm in size (Fig. 4C, D). Including radiating back pain, and weakness in the right upper, lower limbs and left lower limbs that were not previously present had been assumed to be related to spinal metastasis. We performed three surgeries on the patient. First, we decided to operate on the recurring tumor in the brain. For the spinal tumors, we planned to operate on the lumbar region first, followed by the cervical region. Craniotomy was achieved using a previous incision. Gross total resection was performed, and this included the lateral walls of the superior sagittal sinus and falx, which were invaded by the tumor. In the lumbar region, subtotal laminectomy was conducted for the L3 lamina, and the tumor was removed by total laminectomy for the L4 lamina. Facetectomy was conducted to ensure complete tumor resection because it was difficult to remove the tumor while preserving the right facet. To prevent spinal instability, pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion were performed on the L4 and L5 lamina. The tumor in the cervical area was removed by total laminectomy of the C2 lamina; however, the tumor in the left neural foramen area surrounded the vertebral artery and could not be completely removed. Biopsies and immunohistochemical staining were performed during each of the surgeries. Brain tumors showed the proliferation of atypical cells with positivity for epithelial membrane antigen, confirming the diagnosis of meningioma. The tumor was classified as an anaplastic meningioma (WHO grade III) because the tumor cells had nuclear atypia, indicating malignancy. The tumor also showed extensive necrosis, high mitotic activity (19 mitoses/10 high-power fields [HPFs]), and a high Ki-67 proliferation index (approximately 30%). Although tumors in the lumbar and cervical lesions had low mitotic activity (2 mitoses/10 HPFs versus 1 mitoses/10 HPFs), both tumors also showed the same nuclear atypia as tumors in the brain and were diagnosed as anaplastic meningioma. Necrosis and a high Ki-67 proliferation index were also identified in the cervical and lumbar tumors. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and S-100 proteins were absent in all three tumors (Fig. 5). The patient provided informed consent and this case report was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Pusan National University Yang-san Hospital (IRB No. 2023-10-020).

Fig. 3.

Magnetic resonance images shows a new appearance of homogenous enhancing extra-axial and en-plaque type mass at the right parasagittal area.

Fig. 4.

Magnetic resonance images shows a homogeneously enhanced mass with suspected metastasis in the left extradural space at the C2–3 level and the right extradural space at the L3–4 level. T1-weighted axial and sagittal images with gadolinium enhancement. (A, B) Cervical lesion. (C, D) Lumbar lesion.

Fig. 5.

Pathologic findings of the tumor. (A) Brain tumor has highly cellular, large cells exhibiting prominent and overlapping nucleoli. (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E], ×200 magnification). (B) Immunohistochemical stain showing focal positivity for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and (C) Ki-67 index about 30% in brain tumor (×100 magnification). (D) Tumor cells in the lumbar lesion show necrosis and moderate nuclear atypia (H&E, ×200 magnification). (E) Immunohistochemical stain showing focal positivity for EMA and (F) Ki-67 index about 30% in the lumbar lesion (×100 magnification). (G) Tumor cells in the cervical lesion show moderate nuclear atypia, although the area of necrosis was not definite (H&E, ×200 magnification). (H) Immunohistochemical stain showing focal positivity for EMA and (I) Ki-67 index about 30% in the lumbar lesion (×100 magnification).

DISCUSSION

Meningioma originates from the intracranial meninges, consists of meningeal epithelial cells, and is one of the most common tumors that affect the central nervous system6). Although meningiomas are often benign, their clinical characteristics are variable. In certain histologically distinct subsets, they may recur after complete resection14). Malignancy and extracranial metastasis are rare in meningioma1,3). According to WHO criteria, meningiomas are histopathologically subdivided into three grades8) (Table 1). A high probability of grade II and III extracranial metastasis has been reported in the literature5,16). The most frequent sites of metastasis for malignant meningioma are the lungs (60%), abdomen and liver (34%), cervical lymph nodes (18%), iliac, pelvic, and cranial cavity (11%), pleural (9%), central nervous system (7%), and mediastinum (5%), Only 7% occur in the vertebrae7). Cases of spinal metastases are rare. A few cases of spinal metastases have been published to date13,17,18). Immunohistochemical analysis of Ki-67 proliferation index or CDKN2A deletion, associated with 9p21 deletion, is also useful in assessing meningioma recurrence and/or metastasis15).

The World Health Organization classification of meningiomas

Surgical resection may also increase the risk of iatrogenic metastasis of meningiomas with atypical histology, which is believed to be the case in this patient. The primary tumor was located around the Sylvian fissure, and it is presumed that the Sylvian fissure was exposed during the initial and revision surgeries. This iatrogenic cause created a passage between the tumor and the subarachnoid space, which eventually provided an opportunity for the tumor to spread freely along the pathway of cerebrospinal fluid1,11). In addition, the primary tumor was an anaplastic meningioma, and its multiple recurrences and short interval suggest that extracranial metastasis may have occurred9,10). Therefore, based on experience in our case, although the incidence of intracranial anaplastic meningioma is low, spinal metastases can occur even with small tumors.

Currently, there are no consensus guidelines for the treatment of metastatic meningioma4). The treatment methods for spinal metastases include medical therapy, surgery, and radiation therapy. Based on the extension of life expectancy of patients with tumors due to the development of modern medicine and experience in our case, it is thought that surgical intervention is necessary when pain control, nerve function recovery, and spinal stabilization are to be achieved.

CONCLUSION

Although uncommon, metastasis of primary malignant meningioma should always be included in the differential diagnosis once there is evidence of pathology and immunohistochemical analysis suggesting metastasis. In addition, if a patient is diagnosed with malignant meningioma, evaluation for spinal metastases is necessary.

Notes

FUNDING

This study was supported by a 2022 research grant from Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital.

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Akimura T, Orita T, Hayashida O, Nishizaki T, Fudaba H. Malignant meningioma metastasizing through the cerebrospinal pathway. Acta Neurol Scand 85:368–371. 1992;
2. Apra C, Peyre M, Kalamarides M. Current treatment options for meningioma. Expert Rev Neurother 18:241–249. 2018;
3. Conrad MD, Schonauer C, Pelissou-Guyotat I, Morel C, Madarassy G, Deruty R. Recurrent lumbosacral metastases from intracranial meningioma. Report of a case and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143:935–937. 2001;
4. Durand A, Labrousse F, Jouvet A, Bauchet L, Kalamaridès M, Menei P, et al. WHO grade II and III meningiomas: a study of prognostic factors. J Neurooncol 95:367–375. 2009;
5. Estanislau ES, Carvalho GT, Reis BL, de Freitas Barbosa W, Brandão RA, Sousa AA, et al. Malignant meningioma with extracranial metastases. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 67:730–732. 2009;
6. Euskirchen P, Peyre M. Management of meningioma. Presse Med 47:e245–e252. 2018;
7. Fabi A, Nuzzo C, Vidiri A, Ciccarese M, Felici A, Cattani F, et al. Bone and lung metastases from intracranial meningioma. Anticancer Res 26:3835–3857. 2006;
8. Harter PN, Braun Y, Plate KH. Classification of meningiomas-advances and controversies. Chin Clin Oncol 6:S2. 2017;
9. Kessler RA, Garzon-Muvdi T, Yang W, Weingart J, Olivi A, Huang J, et al. Metastatic Atypical and Anaplastic Meningioma: A Case Series and Review of the Literature. World Neurosurg 101:47–56. 2017;
10. Lee GC, Choi SW, Kim SH, Kwon HJ. Multiple extracranial metastases of atypical meningiomas. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 45:107–111. 2009;
11. Ludwin SK, Conley FK. Malignant meningioma metastasizing through the cerebrospinal pathways. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 38:136–142. 1975;
12. Modha A, Gutin PH. Diagnosis and treatment of atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: a review. Neurosurgery 57:538–550. 2005;
13. Palmer JD, Cook PL, Ellison DW. Extracranial osseous metastases from intracranial meningioma. Br J Neurosurg 8:215–218. 1994;
14. Perry A, Stafford SL, Scheithauer BW, Suman VJ, Lohse CM. Meningioma grading: an analysis of histologic parameters. Am J Surg Pathol 21:1455–1465. 1997;
15. Terzi A, Saglam EA, Barak A, Soylemezoglu F. The significance of immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67, p53, p21, and p16 in meningiomas tissue arrays. Pathol Res Pract 204:305–314. 2008;
16. Thomas RZ, Dalal I. Extracranial metastases of anaplastic meningioma. BJR Case Rep 3:20150092. 2017;
17. Tominaga T, Koshu K, Narita N, Yoshimoto T. Metastatic meningioma to the second cervical vertebral body: a case report. Neurosurgery 34:538–539. discussion 539-540. 1994;
18. Tournat H, Huchet A, Ouhabrache N, Thomas IC, Roubaud G, Maire JP. [Bone metastatic evolution of a recurrent meningioma: case report]. Cancer Radiother 10:590–594. 2006;

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Preoperative image. (A) Contrast-enhanced computed tomography shows a mass in the right temporal lobe with peripheral vasogenic edema. (B) Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance images show a strong, homogenous large mass in the right temporal lobe.

Fig. 2.

Eight years after the initial surgery, brain magnetic resonance images revealed an increase in the size of the remnant tumor in frontal lobe.

Fig. 3.

Magnetic resonance images shows a new appearance of homogenous enhancing extra-axial and en-plaque type mass at the right parasagittal area.

Fig. 4.

Magnetic resonance images shows a homogeneously enhanced mass with suspected metastasis in the left extradural space at the C2–3 level and the right extradural space at the L3–4 level. T1-weighted axial and sagittal images with gadolinium enhancement. (A, B) Cervical lesion. (C, D) Lumbar lesion.

Fig. 5.

Pathologic findings of the tumor. (A) Brain tumor has highly cellular, large cells exhibiting prominent and overlapping nucleoli. (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E], ×200 magnification). (B) Immunohistochemical stain showing focal positivity for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and (C) Ki-67 index about 30% in brain tumor (×100 magnification). (D) Tumor cells in the lumbar lesion show necrosis and moderate nuclear atypia (H&E, ×200 magnification). (E) Immunohistochemical stain showing focal positivity for EMA and (F) Ki-67 index about 30% in the lumbar lesion (×100 magnification). (G) Tumor cells in the cervical lesion show moderate nuclear atypia, although the area of necrosis was not definite (H&E, ×200 magnification). (H) Immunohistochemical stain showing focal positivity for EMA and (I) Ki-67 index about 30% in the lumbar lesion (×100 magnification).

Table 1.

The World Health Organization classification of meningiomas

Grading Definition
Grade I - Mitotic count of less than 4 mitoses per 10 HPF
- Absence of brain invasion
- 9 histological subtypes: meningothelial, fibrous, transitional, psammomatous, microcystic, angiomatous, secretory, lymphoplasmacyte-rich, metaplastic
Grade Ⅱ(atypical) - Mitotic count of 4 to 19 mitoses per 10 HPF
- Presence of brain invasion
- 3 of 5 specific histological features: spontaneous necrosis, sheeting, prominent nucleoli, high cellularity and small cells
- 3 histological subtypes: atypical, clear cells, chordoid
Grade Ⅲ(anaplastic) - Mitotic count of 20 or more mitoses per 10 HPF
- Specific histologies: rhabdoid or papillary meningioma

HPF: high-power field.